Upheal vs Mentalyc vs Freed: Which AI Scribe Fits Your Practice?
An honest Upheal vs Mentalyc vs Freed comparison for therapists and clinicians: note quality, HIPAA, pricing, and which one actually fits your workflow.
Saidul Islam
Author

A therapist I know used to spend her Sunday nights catching up on progress notes. Six clients, fifteen minutes each, every session she'd pushed off during the week: ninety minutes of unpaid paperwork on the one evening she actually wanted to switch off. She's not unusual. Documentation is the quiet reason a lot of clinicians burn out, and it's exactly the problem this new wave of AI scribes promises to solve.
The three names that keep coming up are Upheal, Mentalyc, and Freed. If you've searched upheal vs mentalyc vs freed and found nothing but two-way comparisons or vendor pages grading their own homework, this is the head-to-head you actually wanted. I've dug through how each tool is built, who it's really for, and where each one quietly falls short, so you can pick once and stop shopping.
Here is the short version. These three tools look similar on a feature checklist but solve genuinely different problems. Choosing wrong does not just cost money. It costs the migration pain of moving your whole documentation workflow twice.
The one distinction that decides everything
Before pricing, before note formats, understand this: Upheal, Mentalyc, and Freed sit at three different points on the same spectrum.
- Freed is a general medical scribe. It was built for physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants across all of medicine. It listens to a visit and produces a clinical note. It is not therapy-specialized.
- Mentalyc is a therapy-specialized note engine. It does one thing, behavioral health documentation, and it does it with unusual depth. No scheduling, no billing, no telehealth.
- Upheal started as a therapy note tool and has grown into something closer to a full EHR for mental health: notes plus scheduling, telehealth, client records, and treatment planning.
So the real upheal vs mentalyc vs freed question isn't "which has the best notes." It's "how much of my practice do I want one tool to run?" Get that framing right and the decision almost makes itself.
Freed: the fast, general-purpose scribe
Freed earned its reputation with primary care and specialty physicians who wanted to stop typing during appointments. You talk to your patient like a human being, Freed listens, and moments after the visit you get a structured SOAP note ready to paste into your EHR.
What Freed does well is speed and getting out of your way. Onboarding is nearly frictionless, the notes come back clean, and it handles the messy reality of an actual clinical conversation better than most: interruptions, tangents, a patient stacking three problems into one breath.
The trouble for behavioral health is that Freed's templates and clinical reasoning are tuned for medical encounters, not psychotherapy. It doesn't natively produce the note formats therapists live in, like DAP, GIRP, or treatment plans mapped to a golden thread. You can force a therapy note out of it, but then you're editing structure instead of just polishing wording, which defeats the point. It also sits at the pricier end for a tool that only does notes.
Bottom line: Freed is a strong pick if you're a physician, NP, or PA who wants dictation-free medical notes and doesn't need behavioral-health-specific structure. If you're a therapist, keep reading.
Mentalyc: the specialist's note engine
Mentalyc made an early, deliberate bet: be the best at therapy notes and nothing else. That focus shows. It supports an unusually wide range of behavioral health note types, handles both live-session recording and dictation, and generates group and couples notes, which is a genuine pain point that generalist tools just ignore.
Its strength is depth. If your supervisor, insurer, or licensing board wants a specific note structure, Mentalyc probably supports it out of the box, and its notes tend to read like a clinician wrote them rather than like a transcript got summarized. That's a bigger deal than it sounds. Notes that need heavy rewriting don't actually save you time; they just move the work around.
The catch is that it's notes-only by design. No scheduling, no billing, no client portal. If you already have an EHR you love and just want the documentation layer bolted on, that boundary is a feature. If you're trying to untangle a chaotic stack of five tools, Mentalyc fixes one of them and leaves the other four alone. Pricing scales with usage tier, so heavy users sometimes land on a higher plan than they'd budgeted for.
So Mentalyc makes the most sense when you've already got scheduling and billing sorted and you want the deepest, most format-flexible note generation on the market. It's the natural upgrade once you've outgrown a lighter tool. I walk through exactly that migration path in my guide to the best AI-powered SOAP notes app for therapists.
Upheal: the all-in-one for mental health
Upheal wants to be the operating system for your practice, not just your notes. Alongside AI documentation it offers scheduling, telehealth video, client records, and treatment planning: an EHR built for therapists rather than retrofitted from general medicine.
Consolidation is the whole pitch. If you're currently duct-taping together a scheduler, a video tool, a notes app, and a spreadsheet, Upheal collapses that into one login. Its session insights (themes, sentiment, progress signals tracked over time) are the kind of thing a notes-only tool structurally cannot offer, because it never sees the longitudinal picture in the first place.
Breadth has a cost, though. An all-in-one only pays off if you'll actually use most of it. If you already pay for a mature EHR like SimplePractice, adding Upheal for the notes alone means running two overlapping systems and paying twice for the overlap. And the more a tool does, the more there is to learn; the onboarding is noticeably heavier than Freed's deliberately bare-bones setup.
Where Upheal wins is the greenfield case: you're building a practice from scratch, or you're so fed up with a fragmented stack that you'd happily rip it out and start over with scheduling, telehealth, and AI notes under one roof.
Upheal vs Mentalyc vs Freed: side-by-side
| Freed | Mentalyc | Upheal | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Built for | General medicine | Behavioral health | Behavioral health |
| Core scope | Notes only | Notes only | Notes + full EHR |
| Therapy note formats | Limited | Deepest | Strong |
| Scheduling / telehealth | No | No | Yes |
| Group / couples notes | No | Yes | Partial |
| Longitudinal insights | No | Limited | Yes |
| Best fit | Physicians, NPs, PAs | Established therapists | New / consolidating practices |
Treat pricing as the one thing you must verify yourself on each vendor's current page, because all three adjust plans regularly, and a comparison table that quotes stale numbers does you more harm than good. What doesn't change is the structural fit above, and that's what should drive your decision.
The privacy question nobody asks first
Every one of these tools is HIPAA compliant and will sign a Business Associate Agreement, and that is table stakes, not a differentiator. The real question is where your client's most sensitive words go. All three are cloud services: session audio and transcripts are processed on remote servers, run through large language models, and stored off your device.
For most practices with a signed BAA and clear client consent, that's an acceptable, legal arrangement. But a growing number of clinicians, especially those handling higher-sensitivity work, are asking whether the recording needs to leave the room at all. On-device processing, where transcription and note generation happen locally and raw audio never touches a third-party server, is the emerging answer. I've written a full breakdown of that model and its trade-offs in on-device AI therapy notes and what HIPAA actually requires. If data minimization is a core value for your practice, read that before you commit to any cloud scribe.
How to actually decide (a 3-question test)
Skip the feature spreadsheets. Answer these three questions honestly:
- Are you a therapist or a general clinician? General clinician → Freed is the obvious starting point. Therapist → it's Mentalyc or Upheal.
- Do you already have an EHR you're happy with? Yes → Mentalyc, so you don't pay twice for scheduling and billing you don't need. No, or you hate your current stack → Upheal, to consolidate.
- How much format flexibility do you need? If insurers or supervisors demand specific, unusual note structures → Mentalyc's depth wins. If standard progress notes cover you → either fits.
That's it. The upheal vs mentalyc vs freed decision is really a fork in a decision tree, not a points contest.
If you're a solo therapist specifically, the calculus is a little different. The overhead of an all-in-one can outweigh the benefit at low volume. I go deeper on that in my Mentalyc alternative for solo therapists breakdown, and if you're still weighing AI note-takers more broadly, my guide to AI note-taking tools covers the wider field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Freed good for therapists? Freed works for therapists in a pinch, but it wasn't built for behavioral health. You'll spend time reshaping its medical-style output into DAP, EMDR, or golden-thread formats. If therapy is your whole practice, Mentalyc or Upheal will save you more editing time.
What's the real difference between Mentalyc and Upheal? Scope. Mentalyc is a notes-only specialist that plugs into your existing EHR. Upheal is a full mental-health EHR with notes built in (scheduling, telehealth, and client records included). Choose Mentalyc to add documentation to a stack you like; choose Upheal to replace the stack.
Are these AI scribes HIPAA compliant? Yes. All three are HIPAA compliant and offer Business Associate Agreements. The nuance is that they're cloud-based, so session data is processed and stored off-device. If keeping audio local matters to you, look into on-device alternatives instead.
Can I switch tools later without losing my notes? You can export finished notes from all three, but re-training your workflow, templates, and integrations is real work. That's exactly why picking based on structural fit, not a feature checklist, matters up front.
Which is cheapest? Pricing shifts too often to name a winner responsibly. As a pattern: notes-only tools (Mentalyc, Freed) tend to cost less than a full EHR (Upheal) at the entry level, but Upheal can be cheaper overall if it replaces two or three separate subscriptions. Do the math on your actual stack, not the sticker price.
The bottom line
There is no single winner in upheal vs mentalyc vs freed. There is only the right fit for how you work. Freed for general clinicians who want fast medical notes. Mentalyc for therapists who want the deepest, most flexible documentation. Upheal for practices ready to run everything from one place.
Whatever you choose, the goal is the same: get your Sunday nights back and put your attention where it belongs, on the person in the room, not the note about them.
At NexaSphere, we build privacy-first clinical documentation tools designed around exactly that principle: capture the session, generate the note, keep the sensitive data as close to you as possible. If a scribe that respects both your time and your clients' privacy is what you're after, explore what we're building.
Get more insights like this
Join our newsletter for weekly deep dives on AI tools, Chrome extensions, and software engineering.